Langdon Winner: Do Artifacts Have Politics
Having read this article previously for another class, and then revisiting the article for this class, I found that it gave me a new light on the aspect of technology, especially for the study of history. While new technological innovations may be efficient and productive, they can also signify power and authority. This results in the artifact having political influence on society as a whole. For example, the construction of overpasses was created in order to discourage the buses on parkways. By looking beyond the artifact itself, Moses’ ideologies are inherently political in the construction of these overpasses. Moses built the overpass based on his class bias and racial prejudice. He did this in order to allow the upper classes of society to use the parkways while the lower classes would be kept off of the roads because they normally required public transit in order to get to work. While this is looking at an object, if we were to assess technological innovations as objects in historical studies, then we would see the underlying influence that politics has in the scholarly field of history. The introduction of new technologies have become integrated within our lives and the educational system. The problem however is that these new technologies influence us all as students and professionals, but are deemed unscholarly or unprofessional. What I have learned throughout writing such blog posts is the fact that due to the rise of technology within the educational system, we must integrate the technology with history and work together rather than single out one or the other.